Understand when pensions may form part of a divorce financial settlement and what information may be needed before the next legal step to a family law practitioner.
Pensions can be one of the largest assets in a divorce or civil partnership dissolution. In some cases, a pension may be worth as much as, or more than, the family home. A financial settlement should therefore consider pensions alongside property, savings, income, business interests and other assets.
Oakens handles pension-sharing and divorce-finance matters with clear, case-focused support through the appropriate specialist pathway.
A pension sharing order is a court order that allows a percentage of one person's pension rights to be transferred for the benefit of the other party as part of a divorce or dissolution financial settlement.
Government and consumer guidance recognises pension sharing, pension attachment/earmarking and pension offsetting as common ways pensions may be dealt with on divorce. Pension sharing normally requires a formal court order before a pension provider can implement the split.
You should consider advice before agreeing to exclude pensions from a settlement, before signing a consent order, or where the pension value is unclear. Pension settlements can be technical, particularly where there are defined benefit schemes, public sector pensions, overseas pensions or a large difference in retirement provision.
Oakens handles divorce and financial-settlement cases involving pensions, helping clients establish the relevant facts, documents and legal issues so the matter can move forward through the appropriate specialist pathway.
Pensions can be considered as part of the overall financial settlement in divorce or civil partnership dissolution. Whether a pension share is appropriate depends on the full financial picture.
Parties may reach agreement, but pensions should still be considered carefully. A court-approved order is usually needed to make a financial agreement binding.
No. Pension sharing transfers pension rights. Offsetting means one party keeps more pension while the other receives other assets, such as more equity in property.
Tell Oakens about your matter so we can identify the relevant issues and progress the case through the appropriate legal pathway.
Discuss Your Case