Understand when pensions may form part of a divorce financial settlement and what information may be needed before referral to a family law practitioner.
Pensions can be one of the largest assets in a divorce or civil partnership dissolution. In some cases, a pension may be worth as much as, or more than, the family home. A financial settlement should therefore consider pensions alongside property, savings, income, business interests and other assets.
Oakens Associates helps potential clients provide structured information so that a matter can be reviewed efficiently before referral to an appropriate legal practitioner.
A pension sharing order is a court order that allows a percentage of one person's pension rights to be transferred for the benefit of the other party as part of a divorce or dissolution financial settlement.
Government and consumer guidance recognises pension sharing, pension attachment/earmarking and pension offsetting as common ways pensions may be dealt with on divorce. Pension sharing normally requires a formal court order before a pension provider can implement the split.
You should consider advice before agreeing to exclude pensions from a settlement, before signing a consent order, or where the pension value is unclear. Pension settlements can be technical, particularly where there are defined benefit schemes, public sector pensions, overseas pensions or a large difference in retirement provision.
Oakens does not replace legal advice. Our role is to collect initial structured information, assess whether the matter appears suitable for review, and help prepare the file for legal practitioners.
Pensions can be considered as part of the overall financial settlement in divorce or civil partnership dissolution. Whether a pension share is appropriate depends on the full financial picture.
Parties may reach agreement, but pensions should still be considered carefully. A court-approved order is usually needed to make a financial agreement binding.
No. Pension sharing transfers pension rights. Offsetting means one party keeps more pension while the other receives other assets, such as more equity in property.
Answer a short set of structured questions so Oakens can assess whether your matter may be suitable for further review.
Start Assessment